标题: 重新审视事实与价值的区分 [打印本页] 作者: girlspower 时间: 2014-5-12 21:39 标题: 重新审视事实与价值的区分 Abstract: The distinction of “being” and “ought” is considered as foundation of value in modern philosophy. Descriptive sentence whose predicate word is “is” radically differs from judgement sentence whose predicate word is “ought”. The former is fact description, the latter is value judgement. The basic standpoint roots from Hume. However, Hume is aware of the distinction under the background of cultural change in 18 century. When contemporary philosophers take the distinction as basic presupposition, ontology of value is obliterated and value is considered as expression of subjective attitude. Now Neo-naturalists argue that there are two kinds of facts, one is natural fact, and the other is social fact. First has not logic relation with value, but not so is the second. Social fact and value is interrelation with each other. I agree with the standpoint and argue that social fact is the resource of value.